From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Kastelic

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 30, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02677-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 30, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02677-CMA-MEH

04-30-2013

LARRY C. MILLER, Plaintiff, v. CAPTAIN KASTELIC, DANIEL REIMER, and LT. RIDGWELL, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on April 30, 2013.

Defendant Kastelic's and Ridgwell's Motion to Allow Plaintiff's Deposition Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 30(A)(2)(D) filed April 29, 2013; docket #61] is granted in part and denied in part as follows. Although Defendants move under the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court considers their motion under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2)(B) requires a party to obtain leave of court to depose a person confined in prison. As Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at Fremont Correctional Facility in Canon City, Colorado, Defendants properly seek permission from the Court to conduct Plaintiff's deposition. Accordingly, the Court grants Defendants' Motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2)(B).


Summaries of

Miller v. Kastelic

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 30, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02677-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 30, 2013)
Case details for

Miller v. Kastelic

Case Details

Full title:LARRY C. MILLER, Plaintiff, v. CAPTAIN KASTELIC, DANIEL REIMER, and LT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 30, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02677-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 30, 2013)