From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Inslee

Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2019
140 S. Ct. 114 (2019)

Summary

relying on Janus and Knight to find that an exclusive collective bargaining representative arrangement does not infringe on nonunion members' First Amendment rights

Summary of this case from Hendrickson v. AFSCME Council 18

Opinion

No. 18-1492

10-07-2019

Katherine MILLER, Petitioner v. Jay INSLEE, Governor of Washington, et al.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Miller v. Inslee

Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2019
140 S. Ct. 114 (2019)

relying on Janus and Knight to find that an exclusive collective bargaining representative arrangement does not infringe on nonunion members' First Amendment rights

Summary of this case from Hendrickson v. AFSCME Council 18
Case details for

Miller v. Inslee

Case Details

Full title:Katherine MILLER, Petitioner v. Jay INSLEE, Governor of Washington, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States.

Date published: Oct 7, 2019

Citations

140 S. Ct. 114 (2019)
205 L. Ed. 2d 37

Citing Cases

Peltz-Steele v. UMass Faculty Fed'n

See Hendrickson v. AFSCME Council 18, 992 F.3d 950, 968-70 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 142 S. Ct.…

Peltz-Steele v. Umass Faculty Fed'n

government to listen to their views," stating that "Knight speaks directly to the constitutionality of…