From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Industrial Accident Commission of State of California

Supreme Court of California
Apr 10, 1916
172 Cal. 473 (Cal. 1916)

Opinion

L. A. No. 4659. In Bank.

April 10, 1916.

On February 24, 1915, one Oscar Shield, an employee of the petitioner, was injured in the course of his employment, and the petitioner, on the twenty-seventh day of February, and on the second day of March, 1915, paid him compensation. On September 13, 1915, the said Oscar Shield filed his application before the Industrial Accident Commission for an adjustment of his claim, to which the petitioner filed an answer setting up the defense that the proceeding was barred by the statute of limitations contained in section 16 of the Workmen's Compensation, Safety, and Insurance Act. (Stats. 1913, p. 279; Stats. 1915, pp. 1079, 1302.) The commission made an award in favor of said employee, commanding the petitioner to pay him certain compensation. The present proceeding is an application in certiorari to review such award.

Karl L. Ratzer, for Petitioner.

C.M. Bradley, for Respondents.


The court is unanimously of the view that when the statute speaks of the date of the last payment it means the date on which the money is actually paid. The proceeding before the commission must be commenced within six months thereafter, unless there is some agreement for payment of compensation. (Industrial Compensation Act, sec. 16.)

The award of the commission is annulled.


Summaries of

Miller v. Industrial Accident Commission of State of California

Supreme Court of California
Apr 10, 1916
172 Cal. 473 (Cal. 1916)
Case details for

Miller v. Industrial Accident Commission of State of California

Case Details

Full title:J. H. MILLER, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION OF THE STATE…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 10, 1916

Citations

172 Cal. 473 (Cal. 1916)
156 P. 1033

Citing Cases

Railroad Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com

Their effect was to bar the proceeding instituted by Prescos unless there was some "agreement" for the…

O'Malley v. International Motor Truck Corp.

It is the duty of the court, in construing the law, to give effect to all of its provisions if possible.…