From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Hill Corr. Facility Auths.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 10, 2022
Civil Action 22-CV-3639 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 10, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-CV-3639

11-10-2022

STAMAR RICHARD MILLER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITIES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN MILTON YOUNGE, J.

AND NOW, this 10th day of November, because certain individuals listed as Plaintiffs in the caption of this case failed to comply with the Court's prior Amended Order filed on September 22, 2022 (ECF No. 4) directing them to sign the Complaint as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11,and to prepay the filing fee for this case or submit motions to proceed in forma pauperis and copies of their prisoner account statements (or institutional equivalent), the time to do so having now expired, and all Plaintiffs having been warned that the failure to comply with the Amended Order would result in the dismissal of their claims without prejudice for failure to prosecute it is ORDERED that:

The Complaint was submitted without a handwritten signature from each person listed as a Plaintiff. Rather, only the first named person, Stamar Richard Miller, hand-signed the pleading. Each other person currently listed on the docket appears to have placed their printed names on separate pieces of paper that Miller filed with the Complaint.

1. The following Plaintiffs are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute:

Jahmad Lockitt, #22003015

Brian Lowrie, #22003679

Bashir Amin Jackson, #2201325

Steve Motlan, #2200152

Anthony Miller, #21004886

Makkie Velez, #2202424

Marshall Gibson, #22003114

Alfred Hatchatt, #22000682

Eric Michael, #2200938

Bashir Jackson, #22-1525

Jeffrey Williams, #21000293

Auston Luster, #22002547

Tarik Driver, #22001898

Alphonso Leaphart, #21001995

Stephen Snyder, #22033782

Alphonso Johnson, #22001271

Demetrius Creen, #22002878

Robert Miller, #22003689

Jaquan Dorsey, #21005963

Donald Flynn, #22002600

Frank Ward, #22002829

John Roberts, #21003188

Donte Mosley, #21005686

Hasan Hannah, #22001518

Joseph Moore, #21001649

Terence Bower, #22001779

Davon Wise, #22002828

Monyeh Jennings, #22004227

Yusef Moore, #22000707

Kendall Little, #22003760

Allon Ruffin, #22003740

Tyrone Justin, #21005915

Ryan Germany-Hill, #21005786

2. The only Plaintiffs who have complied with the prior Amended Order and submitted a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of their institutional account statements are Staymar Richard Miller, #20002351, and Jermaine Matthews, #22003060.

3. The Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Staymar Richard Miller, #20002351, and Jermaine Matthews, #22003060 are GRANTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

4. Staymar Richard Miller, #20002351, and Jermaine Matthews, #22003060, shall each pay the full filing fee of $350 in installments, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), regardless of the outcome of this case. The Court directs the Warden of George W. Hill Correctional Facility or other appropriate official to assess an initial filing fee of 20% of the greater of (a) the average monthly deposits to Miller's and Matthews's inmate accounts; or (b) the average monthly balance in Miller's and Matthews's inmate accounts for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this case. The Warden of George W. Hill Correctional Facility or other appropriate official shall calculate, collect, and forward the initial payment assessed pursuant to this Order to the Court with a reference to the docket number for this case. In each succeeding month when the amount in Miller's and Matthews's inmate trust fund accounts exceeds $10.00, the Warden of George W. Hill Correctional Facility or other appropriate official shall forward payments to the Clerk of Court equaling 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Miller's and Matthews's inmate accounts until each of their fees are paid. Each payment shall refer to the docket number for this case.

5. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to the Warden of George W. Hill Correctional Facility.

6. The Complaint is DEEMED filed.

7. Miller's and Matthew's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum.

8. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Miller v. Hill Corr. Facility Auths.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 10, 2022
Civil Action 22-CV-3639 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Miller v. Hill Corr. Facility Auths.

Case Details

Full title:STAMAR RICHARD MILLER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 10, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 22-CV-3639 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 10, 2022)