From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Hiatt

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 7, 1943
50 F. Supp. 915 (M.D. Pa. 1943)

Summary

interpreting "the foreign port at which such aliens embarked for the United States" to be the point of "original enrollment, and the one by which the petitioner himself signed on for the voyage"

Summary of this case from Mendis v. Filip

Opinion

No. 147.

August 7, 1943.

No appearances entered.


Habeas corpus proceeding by Edward Harris Miller against William H. Hiatt, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.

Petition dismissed and writ of habeas corpus denied.


The petitioner, Edward Harris Miller, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts, as they appear from the allegations in the petition, are that, having served a penitentiary sentence less good time, he was conditionally released subject to the parole provisions of 18 U.S.C.A. 716b; that, while thus conditionally released under parole supervision, a parole violation warrant issued and he was also during this period charged with and convicted of another crime and is now serving a penitentiary sentence imposed thereunder. The parole violation warrant has been lodged against him in the nature of a detainer. His contention is that this warrant cannot be thus lodged as a detainer and served after he has completed the service of his present sentence.

The petitioner is at the present time legally restrained of his liberty under a sentence imposed by the United States District Court and which sentence is not in question in his present petition for habeas corpus; and whether or not a warrant lodged as a detainer is valid or may be served after he has completed the service of his present sentence is not the proper subject of a proceeding in habeas corpus. McNally v. Hill, 293 U.S. 131, 55 S.Ct. 24, 79 L.Ed. 238.

The present petition is, however, in any event without merit. That the Parole Board may withhold the execution of a warrant for violation of parole while a parolee is serving another sentence is precisely the issue decided in Zerbst v. Kidwell, 304 U.S. 359, 58 S.Ct. 872, 82 L.Ed. 1399, 116 A.L.R. 808.

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed and the writ denied.


Summaries of

Miller v. Hiatt

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 7, 1943
50 F. Supp. 915 (M.D. Pa. 1943)

interpreting "the foreign port at which such aliens embarked for the United States" to be the point of "original enrollment, and the one by which the petitioner himself signed on for the voyage"

Summary of this case from Mendis v. Filip
Case details for

Miller v. Hiatt

Case Details

Full title:MILLER v. HIATT, Warden

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 7, 1943

Citations

50 F. Supp. 915 (M.D. Pa. 1943)

Citing Cases

United States v. Karnuth

Seif v. Nagle, supra. Nothing is found in any of the authorities cited by the applicant which is opposed to…

Rossello v. United States Board of Parole

There is no doubt that the Parole Board may withhold execution of a warrant for violation of a parole while a…