Opinion
Appellate case number: 01-18-00070-CV
02-05-2019
Michele O. Miller and Robert H. Steelhammer v. Green Bank, N.A.
ORDER Trial court case number: 2016-25547A Trial court: 281st District Court of Harris County
On January 21, 2019, appellant Michele O. Miller filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. She represented that "[a]ll other parties have agreed to this dismissal," and she included a certificate of conference with the same representation.
Our review of the record in this case indicates that appellant Robert H. Steelhammer filed for bankruptcy on January 31, 2018 in the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division (Case No. 18-30385). Therefore, this appeal is stayed by the operation of the automatic stay in bankruptcy. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(a).
See Docketing Statement (Feb. 15, 2018), Miller's Third Unopposed Motion to Extend Briefing Deadline (June 11, 2018), Miller's brief (July 11, 2018), Green Bank's Unopposed Motion to Extend Briefing Deadline (Aug. 3, 2018), Green Bank's Second Unopposed Motion to Extend Briefing Deadline (Sept. 6, 2018), and Green Bank's brief (Nov. 9, 2018).
The automatic stay in bankruptcy "deprives state courts of jurisdiction over the debtor and his property until the stay is lifted or modified." Houston Pipeline Co. LP v. Bank of Am., N.A., 213 S.W.3d 418, 428 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.) (quoting Baytown State Bank v. Nimmons, 904 S.W.2d 902, 905 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1995, writ denied)). "An action taken in violation of the automatic stay is void, not merely voidable." Cont'l Casing Corp. v. Samedan Oil Corp., 751 S.W.2d 499, 501 (Tex. 1988). At this time, the Court is without jurisdiction to rule on the unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. See id.
Until the parties notify the Court that the bankruptcy has been concluded or the bankruptcy trustee has lifted the stay for the purposes of this appeal and move to reinstate the case, the Court will take no further action other than to receive and hold any documents tendered during the period of suspension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2.
Unless a party successfully moves to reinstate or sever, this appeal will be an inactive case on the Court's docket. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.3.
It is so ORDERED. Judge's signature: /s/ Peter Kelly
[×] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court Date: February 5, 2019