From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Gladden

Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 31, 1962
377 P.2d 165 (Or. 1962)

Opinion

Submitted December 18, 1962

Affirmed December 31, 1962

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Marion County, GEORGE A. JONES, Judge.

Appellant filed briefs in propria persona.

Robert Y. Thornton, Salem, Attorney General, and C.L. Marsters, Salem, Assistant Attorney General, filed a brief for respondent.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, WARNER, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and GOODWIN Justices.


IN BANC


AFFIRMED.


This was a habeas corpus proceeding. In 1954 petitioner had been sentenced to a term of 15 years in the penitentiary upon conviction of the crime of burglary. In 1958 petitioner was released on parole. In 1961 the parole was revoked and petitioner was returned to confinement. Pursuant to ORS 144.390 the time spent on parole did not diminish the length of his sentence.

Petitioner claims ORS 144.390 attempts to vest judicial power in the State Board of Parole and Probation. He is wrong. The statute reads:

"A prisoner recommitted for violation of parole, conditional pardon or probation shall serve out his sentence, and the time during which he was out on parole is not a part thereof."

The legislature has made the determination and the Board has no discretion. The statute is a proper exercise of legislative power. Greenwood v. Gladden, 1962, 373 P.2d 417.

The order of the trial court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Miller v. Gladden

Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 31, 1962
377 P.2d 165 (Or. 1962)
Case details for

Miller v. Gladden

Case Details

Full title:MILLER v. GLADDEN

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Dec 31, 1962

Citations

377 P.2d 165 (Or. 1962)
377 P.2d 165

Citing Cases

Perkey v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

Appellate courts of this state have repeatedly upheld statutes giving administrative agencies adjudicatory…

Miller v. Gladden

Miller then commenced a habeas corpus proceeding in the courts of Oregon, in which he questioned the validity…