From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Flashner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1959
8 A.D.2d 944 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Opinion

July 6, 1959

Present — Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ.


In an action by an unemancipated minor against her deceased father's estate to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from a judgment dismissing the amended complaint on the opening statement to the jury by counsel for appellant. It was stated in the opening, in effect, that the child was a passenger in a motor vehicle which her father was driving, that he fell asleep and the vehicle ran into a pillar of an elevated railroad, that he had previously fallen asleep for a few seconds, and had awakened just before the occurrence, that is, when the motor vehicle was stopped because of a traffic signal, at which time he said he was tired and sleepy, and that shortly after this he refused to heed a request to stop because of his condition, saying that he was not far from his destination, which was about a mile away. Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Miller v. Flashner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1959
8 A.D.2d 944 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)
Case details for

Miller v. Flashner

Case Details

Full title:MARLENE MILLER, an Infant, by LILLIAN MILLER, Her Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1959

Citations

8 A.D.2d 944 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Citing Cases

Soto v. City of New York

In his opening to the jury, appellant's counsel stated that he expected to prove that respondent's only…

Clements v. Stephens

" Id., p. 673, Pacific Reporter. Likewise, see, Ledford v. Klein, 87 N.W.2d 345 (N.D. 1957); Miller v.…