From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. First Interstate Bank

United States District Court, District of Montana
Jun 11, 2021
CV 21-45-BLG-SPW-TJC (D. Mont. Jun. 11, 2021)

Opinion

CV 21-45-BLG-SPW-TJC

06-11-2021

STACY MILLER and A FEW GOOD CLEANERS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. FIRST INTERSTATE BANK and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants.


ORDER

TIMOTHY J. CAVAN United States Magistrate Judge

Plaintiffs move for the admission of Taras Kick to practice before this Court in this case with David K. W. Wilson, Jr. to act as local counsel. (Doc. 9.)

Pro hac vice admission is governed by D. Mont. L.R. 83.1(d), which provides in pertinent part that the attorney seeking pro hac vice admission must state what court(s) and date(s) of admission the applicant has been admitted to practice. L.R. 83.1(d)(3)(D). While Plaintiffs' motion contains an otherwise complete affidavit, Mr. Kick has failed to fully address L.R. 83.1(d)(3)(D). (See Doc. 4-1 at ¶¶ 4, 5.)

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion to admit Mr. Kick pro hac vice is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiffs may resubmit their motion, provided the motion is accompanied by an affidavit that complies in full with L.R. 83.1(d)(3).


Summaries of

Miller v. First Interstate Bank

United States District Court, District of Montana
Jun 11, 2021
CV 21-45-BLG-SPW-TJC (D. Mont. Jun. 11, 2021)
Case details for

Miller v. First Interstate Bank

Case Details

Full title:STACY MILLER and A FEW GOOD CLEANERS, individually and on behalf of all…

Court:United States District Court, District of Montana

Date published: Jun 11, 2021

Citations

CV 21-45-BLG-SPW-TJC (D. Mont. Jun. 11, 2021)