From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Fed ex Corporate Office

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jan 7, 2008
Case No: 3:07cv18/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Jan. 7, 2008)

Opinion

Case No: 3:07cv18/MCR/MD.

January 7, 2008


ORDER


Pending in this case are defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery (doc. 19), Motion for an Order Holding All Matters Contained Within Its Request for Admissions Be Deemed Admitted and Conclusively Established (doc. 22), and Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) (doc. 36). These motions are based on plaintiff's total failure to respond to defendant's discovery requests. After being granted an extension of time (docs. 33-35), plaintiff has now served her responses ( see docs. 38, 39). Defendant's motions will therefore be denied. The defendant is free, however, to file a new discovery motion should it find plaintiff's responses insufficient.

Accordingly it is ORDERED:

Defendant's motions (docs. 19, 22, 36) are DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Miller v. Fed ex Corporate Office

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jan 7, 2008
Case No: 3:07cv18/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Jan. 7, 2008)
Case details for

Miller v. Fed ex Corporate Office

Case Details

Full title:KIM LASHAWN MILLER, Plaintiff, v. FED EX CORPORATE OFFICE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Jan 7, 2008

Citations

Case No: 3:07cv18/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Jan. 7, 2008)