From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Farley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
May 9, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-465(MTT) (M.D. Ga. May. 9, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-465(MTT)

05-09-2012

TRACY R. MILLER, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT ADAM FARLEY, et al, Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles. (Doc. 34). The Magistrate Judge recommends granting the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17) because the Plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative remedies prior to filing this lawsuit. In light of that recommendation, the Magistrate Judge further recommends denying all pending motions (Docs. 19 & 21) as moot. The Plaintiff has filed an objection to the Recommendation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has considered the Plaintiff's objection and has made a de novo determination of the portions of the Recommendation to which the Plaintiff objects.

The Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this Court. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is granted, and this action is dismissed without prejudice. All other pending motions are denied as moot.

___________

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Miller v. Farley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
May 9, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-465(MTT) (M.D. Ga. May. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Miller v. Farley

Case Details

Full title:TRACY R. MILLER, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT ADAM FARLEY, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: May 9, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-465(MTT) (M.D. Ga. May. 9, 2012)