From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Escalante-Spanish Wells, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Sep 16, 2015
Case No: 2:14-cv-739-FtM-29CM (M.D. Fla. Sep. 16, 2015)

Opinion

Case No: 2:14-cv-739-FtM-29CM

09-16-2015

JACQUEN LESHAYE MILLER, Plaintiff, v. ESCALANTE-SPANISH WELLS, LLC, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #27), filed September 15, 2015, recommending that the parties' Amended Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement (Doc. #26) be granted, the Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims (Doc. #26-1) be approved, and the case dismissed. On the same day, the parties filed a Joint Notice of No Objection to Report and Recommendation (Doc. #28).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table).

After conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #27) is hereby adopted and the findings incorporated herein.

2. The parties' Amended Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement (Doc. #26) is granted and the Settlement Agreement and General Release (Doc. #26-1) is approved as a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute.

3. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice, terminate all deadlines and motions, and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 16th day of September, 2015.

/s/_________

JOHN E. STEELE

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies:
Hon. Carol Mirando
United States Magistrate Judge
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented parties


Summaries of

Miller v. Escalante-Spanish Wells, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Sep 16, 2015
Case No: 2:14-cv-739-FtM-29CM (M.D. Fla. Sep. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Miller v. Escalante-Spanish Wells, LLC

Case Details

Full title:JACQUEN LESHAYE MILLER, Plaintiff, v. ESCALANTE-SPANISH WELLS, LLC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Sep 16, 2015

Citations

Case No: 2:14-cv-739-FtM-29CM (M.D. Fla. Sep. 16, 2015)