From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Dunn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jun 29, 2018
No. 3:18-CV-1457-B-BH (N.D. Tex. Jun. 29, 2018)

Opinion

No. 3:18-CV-1457-B-BH

06-29-2018

BRADLEY B. MILLER, Petitioner, v. VIRGINIA T. DUNN and THE STATE OF TEXAS Respondents.


Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Bradley B. Miller's "Emergency Motion to Compel" (doc. 21), filed on June 8, 2018, is DENIED as moot. By separate judgment, this action will be sua sponte REMANDED to the 330th District Court of Dallas County, Texas, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

SIGNED this 29th day of June, 2018.

/s/ _________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Miller v. Dunn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jun 29, 2018
No. 3:18-CV-1457-B-BH (N.D. Tex. Jun. 29, 2018)
Case details for

Miller v. Dunn

Case Details

Full title:BRADLEY B. MILLER, Petitioner, v. VIRGINIA T. DUNN and THE STATE OF TEXAS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jun 29, 2018

Citations

No. 3:18-CV-1457-B-BH (N.D. Tex. Jun. 29, 2018)