From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Downs

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Aug 18, 2023
3:22-cv-728 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 18, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-728

08-18-2023

ALEX W. MILLER Plaintiff, v. OFFICER F/N/U/ DOWNS Defendant.


ORDER

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Magistrate Judge Frensley has issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 13), to which no objection has been filed. The Court, having conducted the de novo review required by Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to obtain service as required by Rule 4(m), and for failure to respond to prosecute in accordance with Rule 41.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment and close this file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Miller v. Downs

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Aug 18, 2023
3:22-cv-728 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Miller v. Downs

Case Details

Full title:ALEX W. MILLER Plaintiff, v. OFFICER F/N/U/ DOWNS Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Aug 18, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-728 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 18, 2023)