From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Doe

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 13, 2021
21-cv-08264-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-08264-WHO (PR)

12-13-2021

ROYRICK MILLER, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

After plaintiff sent the Court a letter, the Clerk sent him notices directing him to (i) pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP); and (ii) file a complaint on this Court's form. Plaintiff has not complied with the Clerk's Notices nor responded in any way. Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failing to comply with the Clerk's Notices and for failing to prosecute, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen. Any such motion must contain (i) a complete application to proceed IFP (or full payment for the $402.00 filing fee); and (ii) a complaint on this Court's form.

The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Miller v. Doe

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 13, 2021
21-cv-08264-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Miller v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:ROYRICK MILLER, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Dec 13, 2021

Citations

21-cv-08264-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)