From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Dietz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION
May 30, 2019
No. 1:18-cv-1133-JDT-cgc (W.D. Tenn. May. 30, 2019)

Opinion

No. 1:18-cv-1133-JDT-cgc

05-30-2019

QUINTON MILLER, Plaintiff, v. B. DIETZ, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A NON-PRISONER IN FORMA PAUPERIS AFFIDAVIT OR PAY THE REMAINING PORTION OF THE CIVIL FILING FEE

On July 23, 2018, Plaintiff Quinton Miller, who was, at the time, incarcerated at the Trousdale Turner Correctional Center in Hartsville, Tennessee, filed a pro se civil complaint and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) The Court issued an order on July 24, 2018, granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis and assessing the civil filing fee pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)-(b). (ECF No. 4.) However, on April 5, 2019, Miller notified the Clerk he had been released. (ECF No. 5.)

Under the PLRA, a prisoner bringing a civil action must pay the full filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The statute merely provides the prisoner the opportunity to make a "downpayment" of a partial filing fee and pay the remainder in monthly installments. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). However, in this case, only $58.48 of the filing fee was paid prior to Miller's release. Under these circumstances, the Sixth Circuit has held "the obligation to pay the remainder of the fees is to be determined solely on the question of whether the released individual qualifies for pauper status." McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 613 (6th Cir. 1997), partially overruled on other grounds by LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013).

Miller must either renew his pauper status or pay the remainder of the civil filing fee. Therefore, he is ORDERED to submit, on or before June 20, 2019, either a properly completed and signed non-prisoner in forma pauperis affidavit or the remaining $341.52 of the $400 civil filing fee. The Clerk shall mail Miller a copy of the non-prisoner in forma pauperis affidavit form along with this order.

The civil filing fee is $350. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Under § 1914(b) and the Schedule of Fees set out following the statute, an administrative fee of $50 for filing any civil case also is required. Because that additional $50 fee does not apply if leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, only the $350 fee was assessed in the July 24, 2018, order. However, if Miller does not renew his pauper status he will be responsible for the entire $400 fee. --------

Failure to comply with this order in a timely manner will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ James D. Todd

JAMES D. TODD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Miller v. Dietz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION
May 30, 2019
No. 1:18-cv-1133-JDT-cgc (W.D. Tenn. May. 30, 2019)
Case details for

Miller v. Dietz

Case Details

Full title:QUINTON MILLER, Plaintiff, v. B. DIETZ, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 30, 2019

Citations

No. 1:18-cv-1133-JDT-cgc (W.D. Tenn. May. 30, 2019)