From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Denney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 23, 2013
No. 4:10-CV-314 CAS (E.D. Mo. Jan. 23, 2013)

Opinion

No. 4:10-CV-314 CAS

01-23-2013

LARRY MILLER, Petitioner, v. LARRY DENNEY, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

On March 3, 2010, the undersigned ordered that on or before April 2, 2010, the parties were to inform the Court, in writing, whether the Honorable Booker Shaw, the undersigned's brother, presided over any aspect of petitioner's state court proceedings. Neither party responded to the March 3, 2010 Memorandum and Order. It has recently come to the Court's attention that indeed Judge Booker Shaw did preside over petitioner's appeal in state court. Therefore, the undersigned concludes there are circumstances present in this case which give rise to the need for recusal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(5)(iii).

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is transmitted to the Clerk of the Court for random reassignment to another district judge.

______________________

CHARLES A. SHAW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Miller v. Denney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 23, 2013
No. 4:10-CV-314 CAS (E.D. Mo. Jan. 23, 2013)
Case details for

Miller v. Denney

Case Details

Full title:LARRY MILLER, Petitioner, v. LARRY DENNEY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 23, 2013

Citations

No. 4:10-CV-314 CAS (E.D. Mo. Jan. 23, 2013)