From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Currey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 20, 2007
No. CIV S-07-1605 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1605 MCE DAD P.

August 20, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee. In his application, petitioner challenges a judgment of conviction entered in the Madera County Superior Court. Madera County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 3-120(d).

Pursuant to Local Rule 3-120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721


Summaries of

Miller v. Currey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 20, 2007
No. CIV S-07-1605 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2007)
Case details for

Miller v. Currey

Case Details

Full title:BARRY DEAN MILLER, Petitioner, v. BEN CURREY, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 20, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1605 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2007)