From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Culbertson

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 13, 2014
571 U.S. 1159 (2014)

Summary

In Culbertson v. Miller, 26 Ont. 36, a party who desired to haul ice from the lake over lots on the lake front was prevented from doing so by another party unless he would pay a certain toll which this other party unjustly, but in good faith and without malice, demanded. It was held that the first party should have paid the toll under protest, and that he could not refuse to do so, and thereupon recover of the second party for the loss resulting to his business because of his being prevented from hauling and shipping his ice.

Summary of this case from Mabb v. Stewart

Opinion

No. 13–397.

01-13-2014

Norman L. MILLER, petitioner, v. HINSHAW & CULBERTSON, et al.


Petition for rehearing denied.


Summaries of

Miller v. Culbertson

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 13, 2014
571 U.S. 1159 (2014)

In Culbertson v. Miller, 26 Ont. 36, a party who desired to haul ice from the lake over lots on the lake front was prevented from doing so by another party unless he would pay a certain toll which this other party unjustly, but in good faith and without malice, demanded. It was held that the first party should have paid the toll under protest, and that he could not refuse to do so, and thereupon recover of the second party for the loss resulting to his business because of his being prevented from hauling and shipping his ice.

Summary of this case from Mabb v. Stewart
Case details for

Miller v. Culbertson

Case Details

Full title:Norman L. MILLER, petitioner, v. HINSHAW & CULBERTSON, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jan 13, 2014

Citations

571 U.S. 1159 (2014)
134 S. Ct. 991
187 L. Ed. 2d 839
82 U.S.L.W. 3408

Citing Cases

Mabb v. Stewart

In Dillon v. Anderson, 43 N.Y. 237, a party who contracted for the erection of a building gave notice without…