From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Cnty. of Nassau

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 20, 2012
12-CV-4466(JS)(WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 20, 2012)

Opinion

12-CV-4466(JS)(WDW)

11-20-2012

DANIEL MILLER, RANDY COLON, HUGH SMITH, EDWARD VAIANA, ELVI RODRIGUEZ, and TYRON MAYNOR, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, MICHAEL J. SPOSATO, Sheriff of Nassau County, ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH, INC., DR. KAY, M.D., DR. OMANU, M.D., DR. VINCENT MANETTI, M.D., NURSING ADMINISTRATOR HAILEY, DR. SANTARELLI, DDS, Defendants.

For Plaintiff: Daniel Miller, 12003565, pro se Randy Colon, 11004724, pro se Edward Vaiana, 11006713, pro se Elvi Rodriguez, 12005521, pro se Tyron Maynor, 11009446, pro sSe Nassau County Correctional Center 100 Carman Ave. East Meadow, NY 11554 Hugh Smith, 12006323, pro se Downstate Correctional Facility Box F Red Schoolhouse Road Fishkill, NY 12524-0445 For Defendants: No Appearances


ORDER

APPEARANCES For Plaintiff: Daniel Miller, 12003565, pro se

Randy Colon, 11004724, pro se

Edward Vaiana, 11006713, pro se

Elvi Rodriguez, 12005521, pro se

Tyron Maynor, 11009446, pro sSe

Nassau County Correctional Center

100 Carman Ave.

East Meadow, NY 11554

Hugh Smith, 12006323, pro se

Downstate Correctional Facility

Box F

Red Schoolhouse Road

Fishkill, NY 12524-0445
For Defendants: No Appearances SEYBERT, District Judge:

Incarcerated pro so plaintiffs Daniel Miller ("Miller"), Randy Colon ("Colon"), Hugh Smith ("Smith"), Edward Vaiana ("Vaiana"), Elvi Rodriguez ("Rodriguez"), and Tyron Maynor ("Maynor") filed an in forma pauperis Complaint on September 6, 2012, together with applications to proceed in forma pauperis for each plaintiff. By Order dated October 4, 2012, the Court granted the in forma pauperis applications of Colon, Smith, Vaiana, Rodriguez, and Maynor and denied the application of Miller pursuant to the "three strikes" provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Miller was directed to pay his pro rata share of the $350.00 filing fee within fourteen (14) days of the date of the October 4, 2012 Order and was warned that failure to do so would lead to dismissal of the Complaint. (See Order, dated October 4, 2012, Seybert, D.J.) To date, Miller has not paid the fee nor has he otherwise communicated with the Court with regard to this case. Accordingly, Miller's claims are now DISMISSED without prejudice.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedae v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45, 82 S. Ct. 917, 8 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1962).

SO ORDERED.

________

JOANNA SEYBERT, U.S.D.J.
Dated: November 20 2012

Central Islip New York


Summaries of

Miller v. Cnty. of Nassau

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 20, 2012
12-CV-4466(JS)(WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Miller v. Cnty. of Nassau

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL MILLER, RANDY COLON, HUGH SMITH, EDWARD VAIANA, ELVI RODRIGUEZ, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 20, 2012

Citations

12-CV-4466(JS)(WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 20, 2012)