From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Cates

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 19, 2023
1:20-cv-1243-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2023)

Opinion

1:20-cv-1243-HBK (PC)

01-19-2023

CURTIS MILLER, Plaintiff, v. B. CATES, FAYE MONTEGRANDE, OLUFEMI OWOLABI, U. BANGIA, Defendants.


ORDER TO FILE RESPONSE OR MOTION DEEMED SUBMITTED AND UNOPPOSED

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court upon periodic review of the file. On November 3, 2022, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 23). Local Rule 230 requires a party in a prisoner action to file opposition to any motion within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of the motion. See L.R. 230(1). Defendants certify they placed the motion in the mail on November 3, 2023. (Doc. No. 23 at 11). As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss and the time to do so has expired. The failure of the responding party to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion. L.R. 230(1).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Because the twenty-one-day period has expired, the Court will deem Defendants' motion to dismiss submitted within fourteen (14) days from the date on this Order. Absent any opposition by Plaintiff, the motion shall be deemed unopposed.


Summaries of

Miller v. Cates

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 19, 2023
1:20-cv-1243-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Miller v. Cates

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS MILLER, Plaintiff, v. B. CATES, FAYE MONTEGRANDE, OLUFEMI OWOLABI…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 19, 2023

Citations

1:20-cv-1243-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2023)