From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Carrizales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Nov 28, 2012
No. CIV-12-69-FHS (E.D. Okla. Nov. 28, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV-12-69-FHS

11-28-2012

BARBARA K. MILLER, Plaintiff, v. JOE CARRIZALES; MISSOURI MPP CORPORATION; and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

In this diversity action, Defendant, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company ("Liberty Mutual"), has filed a Motion For Summary Judgment And Request For Removal From The Case Caption (Dkt. No. 18) asking this Court to enter summary judgment in its favor on the basis that "Oklahoma law does not permit a direct action against a liability insurance carrier in the absence of statutory authority." It is Liberty Mutual's position that no such statutory authority exists herein and, as a result, Plaintiff cannot maintain a direct action against it at this time. In response, Plaintiff concedes Liberty Mutual's position and consents to the entry of summary judgment in favor of Liberty Mutual. Based on the arguments presented by Liberty Mutual and Plaintiff's concession, the Court finds that Liberty Mutual's Motion For Summary Judgment And Request For Removal From The Case Caption (Dkt. No. 18) should be granted. Summary judgment is therefore entered in favor of Liberty Mutual and Liberty Mutual is ordered removed from the case caption.

It is so ordered this 28th day of November, 2012.

____________

Frank H. Seay

United States District Judge

haste m District of Oklahoma


Summaries of

Miller v. Carrizales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Nov 28, 2012
No. CIV-12-69-FHS (E.D. Okla. Nov. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Miller v. Carrizales

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA K. MILLER, Plaintiff, v. JOE CARRIZALES; MISSOURI MPP CORPORATION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Nov 28, 2012

Citations

No. CIV-12-69-FHS (E.D. Okla. Nov. 28, 2012)