From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Care

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 17, 2009
Case No. 2:09-cv-00822, Doc. No. 13 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 17, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-cv-00822, Doc. No. 13.

December 17, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


The complaint in the above captioned case was received by the Clerk of Court on June 24, 2009, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Local Rules of Court 72.C and 72.D.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 19), filed on November 25, 2009, recommended that the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Family Medical Leave Act Claims from the Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Citizen Care (Doc. No. 13), be granted. Service was made on all counsel of record. The parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.D.2 of the Local Rules of Court, that they had ten (10) days to file any objections. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation.

After review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 2009, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Family Medical Leave Act claims from the Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Citizen Care (Doc. No. 13), is GRANTED and said claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 19) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated November 25, 2009, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Miller v. Care

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 17, 2009
Case No. 2:09-cv-00822, Doc. No. 13 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 17, 2009)
Case details for

Miller v. Care

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE L. MILLER, Plaintiff, v. CITIZEN CARE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 17, 2009

Citations

Case No. 2:09-cv-00822, Doc. No. 13 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 17, 2009)

Citing Cases

Hepner v. Thomas Jefferson Univ. Hosps., Inc.

"A plaintiff states a valid cause of action for retaliation where he asserts that; (1) he is protected under…