From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Burlington Mills Ribbon Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1950
276 App. Div. 1087 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Opinion

April 3, 1950.


In an action by an employee to recover damages for breach of an employment contract, the defendant employer appeals from so much of an order as grants the plaintiff's motion to strike out the defense pleaded in the answer as insufficient in law. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to serve an amended answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The defense contains no statement of fact to justify the conclusion of the pleader that there was gross misrepresentation, or from which it could be determined that the plaintiff was unfit to perform the duties for which he was hired, or that he was addicted to misrepresenting. Carswell, Acting P.J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Miller v. Burlington Mills Ribbon Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1950
276 App. Div. 1087 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
Case details for

Miller v. Burlington Mills Ribbon Corp.

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD S. MILLER, Respondent, v. BURLINGTON MILLS RIBBON CORP., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1950

Citations

276 App. Div. 1087 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)