Miller v. Brown

Full title: MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER, Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 10, 2011

1:10-cv-00453 LJO JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2011)

Opinion

MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER, Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, et al., Defendants. No. 1:10-cv-00453 LJO JLT (PC). United States District Court, E.D. California. January 10, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 16)

          LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.

         Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On September 30, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff and contained noticed that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302, the Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge filed September 30, 2010, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's motion to remand this matter is denied.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.