From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Oct 11, 2011
2:11- CV-00456 JAM DAD (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

2:11- CV-00456 JAM DAD

10-11-2011

EDNA MILLER; David McGuire, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Edmund G. "Jerry" Brown, Jr., an individual; Julie Harlan, an individual; David J. Neil, an individual; Jill H. Talley, an individual; Lewis Kuykendall, an individual; Kathy Bibb, an individual et al. DOES ONE through SIX, INCLUSIVE, Defendants.

Submitted by: KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California JERALD L. MOSLEY, State Bar No. 106072 Supervising Deputy Attorney General KENNETH C. JONES, State Bar No. 132740 Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Julie Harlan, David J. Neill, Jill H. Talley, Lewis Kuykendall and Kathy Bibb


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO SET ASIDE

DEFAULTS AND QUASH SERVICE AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS [Docket Nos. 59 and 61]


U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez

The motions filed by defendants Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Lewis Kuykendall and Kathy Bibb [docket no. 59], and joined by Julie Harlan, David J. Neill and Jill H. Talley [docket no. 61], to Set Aside Defaults and Quash Service of Summons and for Monetary Sanctions against plaintiffs Edna Miller and David McGuire and their counsel of record Vip Bhola came on regularly for hearing on October 5, 2011, before the Honorable John A. Mendez, District Court Judge.

Attorney Vip Bhola of the Law Offices of Vip Bhola appeared on behalf of plaintiffs, and Deputy Attorney General Kenneth C. Jones of the Office of the Attorney General of the State of California appeared on behalf of defendants.

Now therefore, after considering the papers and evidence submitted in support of and in opposition to the motions and good cause appearing therefor:

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

1. That the defaults entered by the clerk of the court against Edmund G. Brown, Jr., on June 8, 2011 [Docket no. 51]; against Lewis Kuykendall and Kathy Bibb on May 19, 2011 [Docket no. 45]; and against Julie Harlan, David J. Neill and Jill H. Talley on June 17, 2011 [Docket no. 58] are set aside;

2. That the purported service of summons on each defendant is quashed; and

3. That an award of expenses and monetary sanctions be issued in favor of defendants and against attorney Vip Bhola in the amount of $7,175.00. Said sanctions shall be payable to the Attorney General of California and delivered to the clerk of the court within 90 days of the date of the hearing.

John A. Mendez U.S. District Judge

Submitted by:

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672

Attorney General of California

JERALD L. MOSLEY, State Bar No. 106072

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

KENNETH C. JONES, State Bar No. 132740

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants

Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Julie Harlan,

David J. Neill, Jill H. Talley, Lewis Kuykendall

and Kathy Bibb


Summaries of

Miller v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Oct 11, 2011
2:11- CV-00456 JAM DAD (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Miller v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:EDNA MILLER; David McGuire, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Edmund G. "Jerry…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

2:11- CV-00456 JAM DAD (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)