From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 13, 2012
CASE NO.: 2:11-cv-00456-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 2:11-cv-00456-JAM-DAD

02-13-2012

Edna Miller; David McGuire Plaintiffs, v. Edmund G. "Jerry" Brown, JR., et. al., Defendants.

Vip Bhola (SBN 183980) LAW OOFFICES OF VIP BHOLA Attorneys for Plaintiffs Edna Miller and David McGuire


Vip Bhola (SBN 183980)

LAW OOFFICES OF VIP BHOLA

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Edna Miller and

David McGuire

[PROPOSED] ORDER


Dept.: 6

Judge: John A. Mendez

HAVING considered the Motion to be Relieved as Counsel filed by Plaintiffs' Attorneys, and pursuant to Local Rule, the Court finds there is no substantial reason to schedule a hearing for the Motion thus no appearance is required by the parties.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

Plaintiffs' Attorneys, Vip Bhola & Associates Inc; and Vipant Kant Bhola are hereby relieved as Counsels of Records for the Plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs are now in the status of Properia Persona which means they are representing themselves thereby they are advised to retain other counsels.

IT IS SO ORDERED!

____________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Miller v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 13, 2012
CASE NO.: 2:11-cv-00456-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Miller v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:Edna Miller; David McGuire Plaintiffs, v. Edmund G. "Jerry"…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 13, 2012

Citations

CASE NO.: 2:11-cv-00456-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2012)