From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Brown

United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento
Oct 12, 2011
2:11-CV-00456 JAM DAD (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)

Opinion

2:11-CV-00456 JAM DAD.

October 12, 2011

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672, Attorney General of California, JERALD L. MOSLEY, State Bar No. 106072, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, KENNETH C. JONES, State Bar No. 132740, Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, Attorneys for Defendants, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Julie Harlan, David J. Neill, Jill H. Talley, Lewis Kuykendall and Kathy Bibb.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO SET ASIDE DEFAULTS AND QUASH SERVICE AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS [Docket Nos. 59 and 61]


Action Filed: 2/18/2011

The motions filed by defendants Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Lewis Kuykendall and Kathy Bibb [docket no. 59], and joined by Julie Harlan, David J. Neill and Jill H. Talley [docket no. 61], to Set Aside Defaults and Quash Service of Summons and for Monetary Sanctions against plaintiffs Edna Miller and David McGuire and their counsel of record Vip Bhola came on regularly for hearing on October 5, 2011, before the Honorable John A. Mendez, District Court Judge.

Attorney Vip Bhola of the Law Offices of Vip Bhola appeared on behalf of plaintiffs, and Deputy Attorney General Kenneth C. Jones of the Office of the Attorney General of the State of California appeared on behalf of defendants.

Now therefore, after considering the papers and evidence submitted in support of and in opposition to the motions and good cause appearing therefor:

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

1. That the defaults entered by the clerk of the court against Edmund G. Brown, Jr., on June 8, 2011 [Docket no. 51]; against Lewis Kuykendall and Kathy Bibb on May 19, 2011 [Docket no. 45]; and against Julie Harlan, David J. Neill and Jill H. Talley on June 17, 2011 [Docket no. 58] are set aside;

2. That the purported service of summons on each defendant is quashed; and

3. That an award of expenses and monetary sanctions be issued in favor of defendants and against attorney Vip Bhola in the amount of $7,175.00. Said sanctions shall be payable to the Attorney General of California and delivered to the clerk of the court within 90 days of the date of the hearing.

Dated: October 11, 2011.


Summaries of

Miller v. Brown

United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento
Oct 12, 2011
2:11-CV-00456 JAM DAD (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Miller v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:EDNA MILLER; David McGuire, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Edmund G. "Jerry…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento

Date published: Oct 12, 2011

Citations

2:11-CV-00456 JAM DAD (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)