From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION
Aug 7, 2017
CAUSE NO. 1:17-CV-330-WCL-PRC (N.D. Ind. Aug. 7, 2017)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 1:17-CV-330-WCL-PRC

08-07-2017

MICHAEL MILLER, Plaintiff, v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, et al., Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Michael Miller filed a Complaint based on diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). On August 4, 2017, the case was transferred to this Court.

The Court must continuously police its subject matter jurisdiction. Hay v. Ind. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 312 F.3d 876, 879 (7th Cir. 2002). As the party seeking to invoke federal diversity jurisdiction, Miller bears the burden of demonstrating that the requirement of complete diversity has been met. Chase v. Shop'n Save Warehouse Foods, Inc., 110 F.3d 424, 427 (7th Cir. 1997). Anything less can result in a dismissal. Mut. Assignment & Indem. Co. v. Lind-Waldock & Co., LLC, 364 F.3d 858, 861 (7th Cir. 2004).

The complaint recites that Miller is a citizen of Indiana, that Defendant Bristol-Myers Squibb Company is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New York, that Defendant McKeson Corporation is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in California, and that Defendant AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP "is a Delaware limited partnership with its principal place of business [in Delaware]." (Compl. ¶ 10, ECF No. 1).

The statement of citizenship is insufficient as to AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. "[F]or purposes of deciding whether a suit by or against a limited partnership satisfies the requirement of complete diversity of citizenship . . . the citizenship of all the limited partners, as well as of the general partner[s], counts." Market St. Assocs. LP v. Frey, 941 F.2d 588, 589 (7th Cir. 1991) (citing Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185 (1990)). Moreover, "the citizenship of unincorporated associations must be traced through however many layers of partners or members there may be." Meyerson v. Showboat Marina Casino P'ship, 312 F.3d 318, 320 (7th Cir. 2002) (citations omitted).

Therefore, the Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff Michael Miller to FILE a Supplemental Jurisdictional Statement on or before August 23 , 2017 , setting forth the identity and citizenship of each of the partners of AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, tracing through all applicable layers of ownership.

So ORDERED this 7th day of August, 2017.

s/ Paul R. Cherry

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Miller v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION
Aug 7, 2017
CAUSE NO. 1:17-CV-330-WCL-PRC (N.D. Ind. Aug. 7, 2017)
Case details for

Miller v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MILLER, Plaintiff, v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION

Date published: Aug 7, 2017

Citations

CAUSE NO. 1:17-CV-330-WCL-PRC (N.D. Ind. Aug. 7, 2017)