From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Apr 26, 2019
No. CV-17-0518-TUC-BGM (D. Ariz. Apr. 26, 2019)

Opinion

No. CV-17-0518-TUC-BGM

04-26-2019

Cynthia Miller, an unmarried woman, Plaintiff, v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Currently pending before the Court is Counsel for Plaintiff's Motion for Award Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 26 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (Doc. 22). Defendant does not object to the fees requested. See Def.'s Response to Pl.'s Mot. for Attorney Fees (Doc. 24). Having reviewed the same, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 22) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffbe awarded attorney's fees of $3,227.96 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).

EAJA fees awarded by this Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 595-98, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2528-29, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010). As such, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if, after receiving this Order, the Commissioner determines upon its effectuation that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, fees will be made payable to Plaintiff's attorneys. If, however, there is a debt owed that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check made out to Plaintiff, but delivered to Plaintiff's attorneys. Any check for EAJA fees shall be mailed to Plaintiff's counsel at the following address: Hallinan & Killpack Law Firm, 5240 East Pima Street, Tucson, Arizona 85712.

Dated this 26th day of April, 2019.

/s/_________

Honorable Bruce G. Macdonald

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Miller v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Apr 26, 2019
No. CV-17-0518-TUC-BGM (D. Ariz. Apr. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Miller v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:Cynthia Miller, an unmarried woman, Plaintiff, v. Nancy A. Berryhill…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Apr 26, 2019

Citations

No. CV-17-0518-TUC-BGM (D. Ariz. Apr. 26, 2019)