From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Jun 19, 2018
Case. No. 17-12788 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 19, 2018)

Opinion

Case. No. 17-12788

06-19-2018

HENRY L. MILLER, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Defendant.



Magistrate Judge David R. Grand ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION , GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER

On December 31, 2014, Plaintiff Miller filed an application for SSI, alleging a disability onset date of March 6, 2007. (Tr. 104, 167, 180, 198). This application was denied at the initial level. (Tr. 104). Miller filed a timely request for an administrative hearing, which was held on June 22, 2016, before ALJ Jan Leventer. (Tr. 32-64). On August 5, 2016, the ALJ issued a written decision finding that Miller is not disabled under the Act. (Tr. 18-31). On June 27, 2017, the Appeals Council denied review. (Tr. 1-6). Miller timely filed for judicial review of the final decision on August 24, 2017. ECF No. 1. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge David Grand. ECF No. 4. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 16, 17), and Miller did not file a reply.

On May 29, 2018, Judge Grand issued a report finding that the ALJ'S decision that Plaintiff is not disabled was supported by substantial evidence. ECF No. 19. Judge Grand recommended that the Court grant Defendant's motion for summary judgment, deny Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and affirm the decision of the Commissioner.

Although the magistrate judge's report explicitly states that the parties to this action could object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, neither party has filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, ECF No. 18, is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 16, is DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 17, is GRANTED

It is further ORDERED that the findings of the Commissioner are AFFIRMED.

It is further ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED.

s/Thomas L. Ludington

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge Dated: June 19, 2018

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on June 19, 2018.

s/Kelly Winslow

KELLY WINSLOW, Case Manager


Summaries of

Miller v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Jun 19, 2018
Case. No. 17-12788 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 19, 2018)
Case details for

Miller v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:HENRY L. MILLER, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 19, 2018

Citations

Case. No. 17-12788 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 19, 2018)