Miller v. B.D.E. (In re B.D.E.)

Full title: In the Interest of B.D.E. Adam D. Miller, Psy.D, Petitioner and Appellee…

Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Date published: Jul 13, 2015

870 N.W.2d 26 (N.D. 2015)

Opinion

No. 20150188.

07-13-2015

In the Interest of B.D.E. Adam D. Miller, Psy.D, Petitioner and Appellee, v. B.D.E., Respondent and Appellant.

Lonnie Olson, State's Attorney, Devils Lake, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief. Ulysses Samuel Jones, Devils Lake, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Olson, State's Attorney, Devils Lake, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.

Ulysses Samuel Jones, Devils Lake, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1]B.D.E. appeals from a district court order requiring him to continue outpatient treatment for six months. B.D.E. argues clear and convincing evidence does not support the district court's finding that he is a person requiring treatment. We conclude the district court's finding that B.D.E. qualifies as a person requiring treatment is supported by clear and convincing evidence and is, therefore, not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (3).

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., LISA FAIR McEVERS, CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, DALE V. SANDSTROM, and DANIEL J. CROTHERS, JJ., concur.