From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 21, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-CV-15678 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 21, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-CV-15678

09-21-2012

WILLIAM JOSEPH MILLER, JR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Defendant.


HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is presently before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. Magistrate Judge David R. Grand has submitted a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") in which he recommends that plaintiff's motion be denied and that defendant's motion be granted. Neither party has filed objections to the R&R and the time for doing so has expired. The court has reviewed the parties' motions and the R&R and is persuaded that the magistrate judge's analysis is correct and that his recommendation is sound. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the magistrate judge's R&R is hereby accepted and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted.

Dated: September 21, 2012

Detroit, Michigan

BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Miller v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 21, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-CV-15678 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Miller v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM JOSEPH MILLER, JR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 21, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-CV-15678 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 21, 2012)