From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Arliskas

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jan 8, 1945
324 Ill. App. 588 (Ill. App. Ct. 1945)

Opinion

Gen. No. 43,236. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed January 8, 1945 Released for publication January 29, 1945

MASTER AND SERVANT, § 55proof admissible in action on contract of employment. Where plaintiff alleged oral contract of employment with defendant automobile agency, only witnesses to its terms being plaintiff and defendant, to effect that defendant agreed to pay plaintiff compensation of $200 per month plus 10 per cent of profits of business, but defendant denied agreement to pay part of earnings or profits of business, held that allegation that plaintiff was to receive 10 per cent of profits was broad enough to permit proof that this was 10 per cent of profits indicated by reports which were made each month to automobile manufacturer, as variance between allegation and proof in order to be fatal must be substantial and material, and actual profits were immaterial.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. JOHN V. McCORMICK, Judge, presiding. Affirmed.

Heard in the first division, first district, this court at the October term, 1944.

Jaffe Jaffe, for appellant; William Jaffe, of counsel.

Bernard McDevitt, Jr. and Fred J. O'Connor, for appellee;

Bernard McDevitt, Jr., of counsel.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed January 8, 1945; released for publication January 29, 1945.


Summaries of

Miller v. Arliskas

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jan 8, 1945
324 Ill. App. 588 (Ill. App. Ct. 1945)
Case details for

Miller v. Arliskas

Case Details

Full title:L. R. Miller, Appellee, v. Frank Arliskas, Trading as A. A. Motors…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Jan 8, 1945

Citations

324 Ill. App. 588 (Ill. App. Ct. 1945)
59 N.E.2d 742