From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Arbors at Gallipolis

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 13, 2008
Case No. 07-1295 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 13, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 07-1295.

November 13, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Certify Order as Appealable (Doc. 24). In its Opinion and Order of October 31, 2008 (doc. 23), this Court denied Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court found that the parties are of diverse citizenship, and that Federal jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a).

The Court does not find that this case presents a close question on the controlling, settled law regarding subject matter jurisdiction and diversity of citizenship, such that "there is substantial ground for difference of opinion." 28 U.S.C. § 1292. Accordingly, there are no grounds for appeal, and Defendant's motion is DENIED.

Bergenstein v. Sawhny, Case No. 1:04-cv-1373, 2007 WL 963305 (N.D. Ohio, March 28, 2007), attached to Defendant's Motion, does not support Defendant's position and is plainly distinguishable from the facts of this case. In Bergenstein, the plaintiffs testified that they had changed their residence to Ohio, and had no intention of returning to their former home in Mississippi. As set out in the Court's October 31, 2008 Order, all of the facts in this case evidenced Kristy Miller's intent to return to West Virginia.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Miller v. Arbors at Gallipolis

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 13, 2008
Case No. 07-1295 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 13, 2008)
Case details for

Miller v. Arbors at Gallipolis

Case Details

Full title:Shirley Miller, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Kristy…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Nov 13, 2008

Citations

Case No. 07-1295 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 13, 2008)