Miller v. Aqua Glass, Inc.

Full title: MIKE MILLER, Plaintiff, v. AQUA GLASS, INC., Defendant

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Feb 11, 2010

Civ. No. 07-3088-CL (D. Or. Feb. 11, 2010)

Opinion

Civ. No. 07-3088-CL.

February 11, 2010

ORDER

OWEN PANNER, District Judge

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error in the Report and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#52) is adopted. Defendant's motion for partial judgment on the pleadings (#46) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.