Opinion
22-2055
06-26-2023
JOHN WILLIAMS MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
John Williams Miller, Appellant Pro Se. William Harrell Foster, III, Katie Elizabeth Towery, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: June 22, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (3:20-cv-00844-TMC)
John Williams Miller, Appellant Pro Se.
William Harrell Foster, III, Katie Elizabeth Towery, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
John Williams Miller appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendant summary judgment on Miller's employment discrimination complaint. On appeal, Miller challenges the court's prior order denying Miller's motions for default judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. Miller v. Apple, Inc., No. 3:20-cv-00844-TMC (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2022). We deny Miller's motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED