Opinion
2:21-cv-00204-BJR
12-17-2021
JENNIFER MILLER, EMAD AL-KAHLOUT, HAMADY BOCOUM, CHRISTOPHER CAIN, GARY GLEESE, JOSE GRINAN, KIMBERLY HALO, CLARENCE HARDEN, KELLY KIMMEY, JUMA LAWSON, STEVEN MORIHARA, SHARON PASCHAL, and PHILIP SULLIVAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. AMAZON.COM, INC., and AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., Defendants.
Kenneth E. Payson, WSBA #26369 Sheehan Sullivan, WSBA #33189 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Richard G. Rosenblatt (pro hac vice) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Michael J. Puma (pro hac vice) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Michael E. Kenneally (pro hac vice) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Kenneth E. Payson, WSBA #26369 Sheehan Sullivan, WSBA #33189 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
Richard G. Rosenblatt (pro hac vice) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Michael J. Puma (pro hac vice) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Michael E. Kenneally (pro hac vice) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE
HONORABLE BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiffs and Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants” or “Amazon”), by and through their undersigned counsel, jointly stipulate and request that the Court grant Defendants until January 13, 2022 to respond to the Second Amended Complaint. As grounds for this motion, the parties state:
1. Plaintiffs filed the Second Amended Complaint on June 3, 2021. Dkt. No. 35.
2. On June 23, 2021, Defendants filed their Motion to Compel Arbitration, tailored to the claims and allegations in the Second Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 40.
3. The Court granted a stay of all case related deadlines, including the deadlines set
forth in the court's Order of March 15, 2021 (Dkt. No. 13), pending resolution of Defendants' Motion to Compel. See Dkt. No. 39.
4. The Court denied Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration on December 9, 2021. Dkt. No. 47.
5. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(4), Defendants' deadline to respond to the Second Amended Complaint is December 23, 2021.
6. Due to scheduling conflicts caused by the upcoming holidays and previously scheduled vacations, the parties have agreed to a three-week extension of Defendants' deadline to file their responsive pleading.
7. Accordingly, the parties request that the Court grant Defendants an extension until January 13, 2022, to file their response to the Second Amended Complaint.
Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court grant this motion and enter the proposed Order filed herewith.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.