From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. 135 Realty Associates, L.P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 23, 1999
266 A.D.2d 113 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

November 23, 1999

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lottie Wilkins, J.), entered September 17, 1998, which granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Partial summary judgment on the issue of liability was properly granted. Defendants had notice the issue that a child under seven resided in the subject apartment and thus were chargeable with notice of any hazardous lead condition therein (see, Juarez v. Wavecrest Mgt. Team, 88 N.Y.2d 628). Defendants' cursory inspections of the apartment, which did not include any tests for the presence of lead, and their belated and inadequate attempts to abate the lead-based paint condition did not meet the standard of reasonableness. The lead-based paint condition was established as the proximate cause of the injuries suffered by the infant plaintiff, who resided in the apartment since birth. We have considered and rejected defendants' remaining contentions. Concur.


Summaries of

Miller v. 135 Realty Associates, L.P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 23, 1999
266 A.D.2d 113 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Miller v. 135 Realty Associates, L.P.

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER A. MILLER, an infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, DEBRA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 23, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 113 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
698 N.Y.S.2d 681

Citing Cases

Steffenhagen v. Morrill

Once a plaintiff has established that a landlord had actual or constructive notice of a dangerous condition,…

Velez v. Stopanjac

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Ellerin, Lerner, Andrias, Friedman, JJ. In this action seeking damages for lead…