From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MILLER LUX INC. v. STARKEY

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Oct 17, 1932
127 Cal.App. 79 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)

Opinion

Docket No. 1034.

October 17, 1932.

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. H.Z. Austin, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

William Weinstein for Appellants.

J.E. Woolley and Vincent J. McGovern for Respondent.


The respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that no transcript has been filed within the time allowed.

[1] It appears, by certificate of the county clerk, that notice of appeal was filed on June 2, 1932, that no proceedings have been begun for the preparation or settlement of either a transcript or a bill of exceptions, that no such proceedings are pending, and that the time therefor has expired. The motion should be granted. ( People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College, 103 Cal.App. 139 [ 283 P. 981].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.


Summaries of

MILLER LUX INC. v. STARKEY

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Oct 17, 1932
127 Cal.App. 79 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)
Case details for

MILLER LUX INC. v. STARKEY

Case Details

Full title:MILLER LUX INCORPORATED (a Corporation), Respondent, v. W.W. STARKEY et…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 17, 1932

Citations

127 Cal.App. 79 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)
15 P.2d 185