From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Millar v. Constr. Code Auth.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 19, 2017
500 Mich. 992 (Mich. 2017)

Opinion

SC: 154437 COA: 326544

05-19-2017

Bruce MILLAR, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. CONSTRUCTION CODE AUTHORITY, Elba Township, and City of Imlay City, Defendants–Appellees.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 4, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the plaintiff’s claim under the Whistleblowers Protection Act was barred by the 90–day limitation period set forth in MCL 15.363(1). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.


Summaries of

Millar v. Constr. Code Auth.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 19, 2017
500 Mich. 992 (Mich. 2017)
Case details for

Millar v. Constr. Code Auth.

Case Details

Full title:Bruce MILLAR, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. CONSTRUCTION CODE AUTHORITY, Elba…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: May 19, 2017

Citations

500 Mich. 992 (Mich. 2017)
894 N.W.2d 600

Citing Cases

Millar v. Constr. Code Auth.

We ordered oral argument on the application and directed the parties to brief "whether the plaintiff's claim…