From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Milkman v. Casesa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

October, 1916.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice to the respondent to renew said motion on additional affidavits setting forth facts and circumstances sufficient to indicate that the plaintiff has a good cause of action on the merits. (See Heischober v. Polishook, 152 App. Div. 193; Rothschild v. Haviland, 172 id. 562.) Carr, Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Milkman v. Casesa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Milkman v. Casesa

Case Details

Full title:WALTER B. MILKMAN, as Trustee, etc., of JOSE CASESA, Bankrupt, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1916

Citations

175 App. Div. 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
160 N.Y.S. 1138

Citing Cases

Wanaksink Lake Development Corp. v. Hannan

* * * Insistence on the observance of the rule makes for the orderly administration of justice, and is not…