From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miletak v. AT&T Services, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Jun 25, 2015
3:12-CV-05326-EMC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2015)

Opinion


NICK MILETAK, Plaintiff, v. AT&T SERVICES, INC., Defendant. No. 3:12-CV-05326-EMC United States District Court, N.D. California. June 25, 2015

          ANNE I. YEN, WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD A Professional Corporation Alameda, California. [PROPOSED] ORDER

          EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

         Based upon notice from Attorney Anne I. Yen and the law firm of Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, they are not counsel in the case of Nick Miletak v. AT&T Services, Inc., Case No. 3:12-cv-05326-EMC. Ms. Yen will be removed from all of the Court's notice and services lists with respect to this matter.

         CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

         I am a citizen of the United States and an employee in the County of Alameda, State of California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200, Alameda, California XXXXX-XXXX. On June 22, 2015, I served upon the following parties in this action:

         [PROPOSED] ORDER

         [X] BY MAIL I placed a true copy of each document listed herein in a sealed envelope, addressed as indicated herein, and caused each such envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid, to be placed in the United States mail at Alameda, California. I am readily familiar with the practice of Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing, said practice being that in the ordinary course of business, mail is deposited in the United States Postal Service the same day as it is placed for collection.

         [ ] BY PERSONAL SERVICE I placed a true copy of each document listed herein in a sealed envelope, addressed as indicated herein, and caused the same to be delivered by hand to the offices of each addressee.

         [ ] BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY SERVICE I placed a true copy of each document listed herein in a sealed envelope, addressed as indicated herein, and placed the same for collection by Overnight Delivery Service by following the ordinary business practices of Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, Alameda, California. I am readily familiar with the practice of Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld for collection and processing of Overnight Delivery Service correspondence, said practice being that in the ordinary course of business, Overnight Delivery Service correspondence is deposited at the Overnight Delivery Service offices for next day delivery the same day as Overnight Delivery Service correspondence is placed for collection.

         [ ] BY FACSIMILE I caused to be transmitted each document listed herein via the fax number(s) listed above or on the attached service list.

         I certify under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct. Executed at Alameda, California, on June 22, 2015.


Summaries of

Miletak v. AT&T Services, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Jun 25, 2015
3:12-CV-05326-EMC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2015)
Case details for

Miletak v. AT&T Services, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NICK MILETAK, Plaintiff, v. AT&T SERVICES, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Jun 25, 2015

Citations

3:12-CV-05326-EMC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2015)