From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miles v. Laursen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 16, 2023
2:23-cv-0663 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-0663 KJM AC P

05-16-2023

GEORGIA MILES, Plaintiff, v. PHILLIPA LAURSEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a county inmate and pre-trial detainee proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF Nos.1, 5. Plaintiff has not, however, filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the form used by this district. Accordingly, plaintiff's application will be dismissed and plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit the application on the appropriate form. Plaintiff is cautioned that she must also provide a certified copy of the prison trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 5) is DISREGARDED as incomplete;

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner, and

3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Miles v. Laursen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 16, 2023
2:23-cv-0663 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Miles v. Laursen

Case Details

Full title:GEORGIA MILES, Plaintiff, v. PHILLIPA LAURSEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 16, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-0663 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2023)