From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miles v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Oct 25, 2022
1:21-cv-00321 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 25, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00321

10-25-2022

RODERICK L. MILES, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI,[1] Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before this court for review of the Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) filed on September 8, 2022, by the Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). (Doc. 24.) In the Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 15), be denied, that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 19), be granted, and that this action be dismissed without prejudice. (See Doc. 24 at 7.) The Recommendation was served on the parties to this action on September 8, 2022. (Doc. 25.) Plaintiff did not file objections, but instead filed a pleading entitled “Plaintiff Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Injunctive Relief,” (Doc. 26), and a supplemental filing, (Doc. 28). Defendant responded to Plaintiff's filings, (Doc. 27).

This court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [Magistrate Judge's] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the [M]agistrate [J]udge. . . . [O]r recommit the matter to the [M]agistrate [J]udge with instructions.” Id.

This court has appropriately reviewed Plaintiff's filings, (Docs. 26, 28), and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. This court therefore adopts the Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 24), is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 15), is DENIED, that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, (Doc. 19), is GRANTED, and that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint requesting a writ of mandamus if he contends that the agency is refusing to act or proceed in his case in a way that precludes him from using the administrative process.

A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Miles v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Oct 25, 2022
1:21-cv-00321 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Miles v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:RODERICK L. MILES, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI,[1] Acting Commissioner…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 25, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-00321 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 25, 2022)