From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miles v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 7, 1999
261 A.D.2d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 7, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, Jr., J. — Summary Judgment.

Present — Green, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for injuries sustained by Ricky L. Miles (plaintiff) when he fell from the ladder of a boxcar. At the time of the accident, plaintiff was employed by defendant as a, conductor at its Frontier Yard. Supreme Court properly denied that part of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the cause of action under the Federal Employers' Liability Act ([FELA] 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq.). Defendant failed to meet its initial burden of establishing as a matter of law "that negligence by the employer could have played no part in [plaintiff's] injury" (Pidgeon v. Metro-North Commuter R. R., 248 A.D.2d 318, 319, citing Inman v. Baltimore Ohio R. R. Co., 361 U.S. 138, 140-141; see, Rogers v. Missouri Pac. R. R. Co., 352 U.S. 500, 506-507, reh denied 353 U.S. 943). The court also properly granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend the bill of particulars to allege defendant's violation of the Boiler Inspection Act ( 49 U.S.C. § 20701). The proposed amendment is based upon the same facts alleged in the original bill of particulars, and there is no indication that defendant has been prejudiced by plaintiffs' delay in seeking leave to amend (see, Ganci v. Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp., 258 A.D.2d 386; Cardy v. Frey, 86 A.D.2d 968, 969-970).


Summaries of

Miles v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 7, 1999
261 A.D.2d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Miles v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Case Details

Full title:RICKY L. MILES et al., Respondents v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 7, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
690 N.Y.S.2d 379

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Supreme Court properly denied that part of Conrail's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the Federal…

Miles v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Same Memorandum as in Miles v. Consolidated Rail Corp. ( 261 A.D.2d…