From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miles v. Commonwealth

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 29, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2047 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 29, 2010)

Summary

finding Sixth Amendment speedy trial claim unexhausted where petitioner acknowledged he did not present claim to Superior Court

Summary of this case from Purnell v. Pennsylvania

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2047.

November 29, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 24th day of November, 2010, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa (Doc. No. 8), to which no objections have been filed, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED without prejudice for failure to exhaust state court remedies.
3. Petitioner's request for a stay of state court proceedings is DENIED.
4. There is no basis to issue a certificate of appealability.
5. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes.


Summaries of

Miles v. Commonwealth

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 29, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2047 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 29, 2010)

finding Sixth Amendment speedy trial claim unexhausted where petitioner acknowledged he did not present claim to Superior Court

Summary of this case from Purnell v. Pennsylvania
Case details for

Miles v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:TYREE MILES, Petitioner v. COMMONWEALTH, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 29, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2047 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 29, 2010)

Citing Cases

Purnell v. Pennsylvania

Moreover, he has not demonstrated that he sought to present any federal speedy trial claims to Pennsylvania's…