From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miles v. Ashby

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 2, 2022
2:22-cv-01918 TLN AC PS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01918 TLN AC PS

11-02-2022

GEORGIA MILES, Plaintiff, v. DAVID ASHBY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The court is in receipt of plaintiff's “request to proceed IFP.” ECF No. 2. However, the request is not signed and does not include all information necessary to a determination of indigence under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1); the second page is entirely blank. Accordingly, the request will be denied without prejudice. Plaintiff must submit a renewed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application on the standard court form, with all sections completed and all requested information provided, or pay the filing fee, by November 14, 2022. The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide plaintiff with a copy of the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. If plaintiff fails to file a renewed motion, this case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Miles v. Ashby

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 2, 2022
2:22-cv-01918 TLN AC PS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Miles v. Ashby

Case Details

Full title:GEORGIA MILES, Plaintiff, v. DAVID ASHBY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 2, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01918 TLN AC PS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2022)