From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Milburn v. Dogin

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Aug 2, 2021
79-CV-5077 (LAP) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 2, 2021)

Opinion

79-CV-5077 (LAP)

08-02-2021

LOUIS MILBURN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HENRY S. DOGIN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge

Before the Court is Class Counsel's motion to substitute representative plaintiffs in this matter. (See dkt. no. 625.) Defendants indicate that they are “willing to conditionally consent to the substitution at this time if the Court allows Defendants to reserve any objections they may have concerning the adequacy of the new class representatives upon receipt and review of the relevant records.” (Dkt. no. 635 at 1.) Class counsel has no objection to that proposal. (See dkt. no. 637.) Accordingly, the motion to substitute the proposed class representatives [dkt. no. 625] is GRANTED, subject to Defendants' right to reserve objections to the representatives.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Milburn v. Dogin

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Aug 2, 2021
79-CV-5077 (LAP) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Milburn v. Dogin

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS MILBURN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HENRY S. DOGIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Aug 2, 2021

Citations

79-CV-5077 (LAP) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 2, 2021)