From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Milazzo v. Barnaby Concrete Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 16, 1968
30 A.D.2d 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

July 16, 1968


Order entered December 6, 1967, herein appealed from unanimously reversed, on the law, with $30 costs and disbursements, and the motion to dismiss the complaint and sever the action as to appellants is granted. The accident upon which this action is premised occurred more than seven years ago. Following upon the commencement of an action almost three years thereafter, the case proceeded in somewhat desultory fashion. There was a lack of compliance with the demand served pursuant to CPLR 3216, which omission continued even up to the return date of the motion to dismiss, which date was almost three months later. No valid excuse or good reason is advanced for the failure to comply with the 45-day notice and demand.

Concur — Stevens, J.P., Steuer, Capozzoli, Tilzer and McGivern, JJ.


Summaries of

Milazzo v. Barnaby Concrete Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 16, 1968
30 A.D.2d 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Milazzo v. Barnaby Concrete Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MILAZZO, Respondent, v. BARNABY CONCRETE CORP. et al., Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 16, 1968

Citations

30 A.D.2d 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Huether v. Blad

Plaintiff's failure to comply with the demand to resume prosecution of the action or, in the alternative, to…